In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Ever Merciful
All is Well …!
Not always do our plans
materialize; not always do our expectations fetch congruous results; not always
do our efforts bear fruit. And then, at times we are faced with staggering
circumstances: a handicapped child is born, a person dies in the prime of his
youth, a flourishing business suddenly runs into great losses, a young lady
becomes a widow, cruel relatives deprive their blood relations from even the
basic necessities of life. The list of course is unending.
The result of all this more often
than not is quite predictable: depression, continued sorrow and sometimes severe
anger and rage. The unexpected brings out from within us reactions which cross
limits.
The Qur’ān says that there may be
various reasons for such untoward circumstances. While explaining one of them it
says:
And
sometimes you dislike a thing and [in reality] there is great welfare for you in
it and sometimes you like a thing and [in reality] there is great harm for you
in it. Allah knows and you know not. (2:216)
It is thus
expected of a Muslim to submit to the Almighty in all circumstances with the
belief that whatever has happened was best for him. We cannot always grasp the
profundity of the Almighty’s wisdom. Time, however, often tells how the
‘untoward’ happening actually positively influences the course of our life. So
instead of becoming upset and frustrated we must resign to his will and wait to
see how things ultimately take shape.
In short, ‘all is well even
if does not seem to end well’.
Express & Explain
*
General Discussion
Forum: Is beating wife
allowed? Does Qur'an
permit?
Pause & Ponder:
*
Obligation to Offer
the Prayer in
Congregation
Announcements
* "Quran for All"
Series: Surah
Humazah
Uploaded
* Successful
Participants
Read and Reflect:
Religious Tolerance: The Islamic Perspective
Mankind seems to be divided by
religious categorisation. Some religious groups are more exclusive in their
approach than others. However, the approach of condemning people belonging to
other faiths, although it has become a much less pronounced problem in recent
times, has not vanished completely.
There have been many approaches
adopted by religious scholars belonging to different faiths to check the
tendency of growing bigotry amongst religious people. The Vatican adopted the
policy of Religious Inclusivism through its decree of 1967 which expressed
sentiments of cordiality for other important world religions. Words of sympathy
were also reserved in the decree for those who have chosen to follow the
approach of atheism.
There are, however, some
Christians scholars who believe that Religious Inclusivism, even though it is a
welcome improvement on Religious Exclusivism, still falls short of being fully
convincing. What has been presented by William Rowland, John Hick, and Paul
Badham is an approach to justify what they describe as Religious Pluralism.
According to this approach, all important religions are genuine human responses
to the same Transcendental Reality, even though influenced by the respective
cultural environments of the religious leaders. Thus all of them are
simultaneously correct, and all offer important insights into the understanding
of the Ultimate.
Both Religious Inclusivism and
Religious Pluralism promise more religious tolerance amongst those who choose to
adopt these points of view, although the latter seems to be more capable of
engendering true respect in the hearts of believers of one faith for the
believers in the other faiths.
Muslims have normally been
considered Religious Exclusivists, who would not hold people of other faiths
worthy of being offered respect for their religious commitments. There is,
therefore, felt a need to present an Islamic point of view on how Islamic
teachings propose to tackle the issue of religious plurality.
Islam, on the one hand takes a
firm position in confirming the unquestionable authenticity of its teachings, on
the other hand it also calls for genuine respect for all non-Muslims. Even
though there seems to be apparently a contradiction in the approach, a better
understanding of the various verses of the Qur’ān on the subject would suggest
that it is not necessarily so.
The correct Islamic approach
towards the non-Muslims is to assume that all of them have, as yet, not been
properly convinced about the authenticity of the divine origins of the teachings
of Islam. It is for the Muslims to help the non-Muslims to appreciate the
truthfulness of the Islamic teachings. That would require not only intelligent
preaching on their part but, perhaps more importantly, a behaviour of respect
for the fellow human beings, irrespective of their faith. The absence of that
behaviour on the part of some Muslims has been an important reason for their
failure to present Islam as a message which is worthy of being taken seriously
by the non-Muslims. Thus true religious tolerance is at the heart of a proper
Islamic behaviour. Thus it will be shown that all Muslims are required to be
extremely tolerant of other faiths and to continue their struggle to convince
them politely.
This approach is neither
Religious Inclusivism of the sort adopted by the Vatican, nor Religious
Pluralism as proposed by Rowland Williams, John Hick, and Paul Badham. It is, in
fact, a call for religious tolerance because of the possibility of lack of
proper communication of the true message of God. Since no body knows whether the
other individual has been communicated the message of Islam properly, therefore,
no Muslim has the right to condemn any non-Muslim on grounds of religious
differences.
Discussion Forum: Family and Marriage: Core Issues
Topic: Disobedient and Parents
Siddiq Bukhary (Moderator) When do the
children have the right to disobey the parents?
saba2 Well can you
please be more specific about the age of children.
ibrahim Of course adult and mature children. saba2 If they are adult and mature then their is no
question of disobedience is there? They are free to make their own choices
which can also differ from their parents. I feel there is a very thin line
between disobedience and making different choices. I think teenagers who can distinguish between
right from wrong may come under the category of being disobedient adult and
mature children cannot come under the category of being disobedient.
A child can be disobedient when he is being
asked to do what is considered gunnah or wrong in Islam and when he feels
physically threatened sexually.
ibrahim
Well, we are bound to follow parents (and all others too) in the limits of
Islam. So such disobedience has no value. You are right that there may be a very thin
line between the two but one can still differentiate. I give you an example:
Parents want to marry a child at one place but
he/she want to marry at another. This is a choice difference. However when
they ask the child to do any useful thing that he/she must do or ask not to
do a harmful thing that he/she must avoid then this will surely be a
disobedience. for example two mature kids are fighting with eachother (may
be verbally) & when a parent ask them to stop. If they do not, they are
disobeying.
I hope I'm able to clear the point. Moreover
you as a senior MOM can yourself give many examples of both cases. Don't
You? It'll need just a deep thinking.
saba2 So
in the eyes of Allah disobedience is allowed when there is shirk committed
and parents expect the children to join in or be a part of it. Is going to
shrines and peers and asking them of favors from God considered Shirk? The example you gave of choice differences is
the one parents have the most difficulty excepting. You hear all sorts of
stories and maximum blackmail when it comes to marriage of choice. “Moreover
you as a senior MOM” how can u tell if I am a senior mom? Hmm I like it, it
gives me a lot of clout.
Can some one please answer the question
ibrahim
Your described act is a shirk act but one may not be doing it as a shirk.
That's a big difference. In Marriage case parents should have the
courage to accept the choice of their kids in case of no settlement between
them just because kids have been given the last right to choose their life
partner. We as a parent can only try our best to guide them the best and in
the best possible way.
loganc
Salaam aliukum brothers and sisters in Islam,
Alhmadulilah. Let us
keep away from this kind of talk - this leads to division in the Ummah and the
only path to success in this diin is together. Rasool Allahi, peace be upon him,
said that 73 sects will emerge and only one will enter jennah. Let us hold fast
to the Qur'an and the kind manners demanded of us. This is not a place of
fighting, insha'Allah ta'ala.
Regarding the topic
at hand, we can see some key points regarding the issues of "beating" a wife.
Firstly, the Qur'an has laid out certain methods in dealing with disagreement
between husband and wife, these must be followed and the last course of action
is a light physical one, note that any action leaving marks on the body is too
harsh - as taught by Muhammad, peace be upon him. Thus "beating" in the English
term is not allowed. However, there is a methodology laid out in the Qur'an and
ahadith that allows for minor physical persuasion. Also note that the Prophet,
peace be upon him, is the best of examples and did not do this, rather he
separated his bed from his wives - and he did this for one entire month at one
point. Also brothers and sisters in Islam, note that the Prophet, peace be upon
him, said that the best of the brothers are those who are best to their wives.
May Allah guide us to
the best of actions. May Allah keep us on His straight path. Amin.
If anything I said
was correct it comes from Allah who deserves all praise and if anything is wrong
it comes from me and the shaitan.
Salaam aliukum
hkhan
(Moderator)
nice to see u after
a while L; salam
how
was ur trip to home.
"A good Idea is Best
Shared" is written on the wish card i received from local bbc (as we join them
occasionally for the discussions about community issues)
yesterday as i was
waiting at a tr. signal behind a local service bus i noticed the advert for a
new car with a pic where a man is pushing an old car and the front portion of
the car is new. it said at the bottom " give a push to your old car. buy a new
one at easy terms "etc.
much fuss is made
about treating women badly in Islam but we can see the times of ignorance in
modern times again. as we read the hx of 'daur e jahlia' in arabia that women
were changed frequently just like a shoe or a slipper, today we can see this
happening just like the changing of a car model. most of the histories I get
from patients and other contacts, it seems like woman is treated no more than an
object (am talking about majority. there are still some morals and family
virtues to be found)
girls at a very
young age are exposed to characters like 'barbie doll' and some other disney
characters where the message is looking beautiful and being available for men.
this continues throughout life. if she is unable to do so, then she can forget
about a suitable place in society, higher status at a job/career etc.
she is valuable,
untill she is attractive and colourful to satisfy man's desires. beating or
killing her to even death on small issues is not a problem.
no wonder the beloved (prophet Muhammad sws)
stressed so much on woman's rights. its a melancholy of all ages and times.
loganc
Salaam aliukum,
Jaza'kAllah khier.
Yes, although let me
just mention one point to our brothers and sisters in Islam because I assume
most of the readers in this forum are Muslims:
We do have an issue
within our Ummah regarding the mistreatment of women. I am not talking about
western secular standards of human rights and women's liberation, rather I am
talking about the Islamic regulations, the Islamic teachings and Islamic
mannerisms that are being forgotten and/or ignored.
Recall a hadith where
the Prophet, peace be upon him, was asked if a woman ought to greet her husband
at the door when he comes home - he, peace be upon him, says that would be nice.
The man (subhan'Allah brothers look how little we have changed since the time of
Rasooli, peace be upon him), thought that he was on a roll and maybe he could
push a little more, so he asks: Is is good for my wife to stand while I eat
(thus she is the server of food rather than the co-eater of food)? Rasool Allahi,
peace be upon him, says: This is the attitude of tyrants.
1400 years later
brothers and sisters, in so many facets of life our brothers are acting like
tyrants. Regardless if it is a cultural hangover or something else, it is not
Islam. We need to return to, or go to, the diin of Islam insha'Allah ta'ala.
If I have said
anything good it is from Allah who deserves all praise and if anything is wrong
or mis-said it comes from me and the shaitan.
Why does Javed
Ahmad Ghāmidī in his book Mīzān apply the divine law related to the
Messengers to the congregational prayers? He seems to hold that the narratives
ascribed to the Prophet (sws) directing the believers to compulsorily attend the
prayers in congregation pertains to his time only and it is no more applicable
afterwards? I mean what is the intrinsic evidence within the narratives which
points to the fact that the law should be applied?
Answer:
In order to
understand this issue, we need to consider the fact that narratives in this
regard are of two types. Both are authentic yet apparently contradicting.
The first
type of narratives gives the message that praying in the mosque is an
obligation that must be fulfilled at all costs and there can be no reason
for a person who hears the adhān to not come to the mosque. For
example:
A blind
person once asked relief from the Prophet (sws) in coming to the mosque, he
was at first given the permission; and then the Prophet (sws) asked him: “Do
you hear the voice of the adhān?” When he answered in the
affirmative, the Prophet (sws) said that he would then have to come to the
mosque.1
The Prophet (sws)
warned people: “I would like to burn the houses of those who do not come for
the prayer, and would like to have them thrown over these people.”2
It is
narrated by Ibn Mas’ūd (rta) that even the sick in those times would come to
the congregational prayer by limping on the shoulders of two people.3
The second
category of narratives give the message that praying in the mosque is highly
rewarding though it is not an obligation. Some of the narratives ascribed to
the Prophet (sws) in this regard are the following:
The
congregational prayer is twenty seven times more rewarding than the
individual prayer.4
If people
knew how highly rewarding reaching the mosque at the time of the adhān
is and standing in the first row is, and if for this they had to cast lots,
they would have done this. And if they knew the reward of outdoing others
for the zuhr prayer, they would have done so. And if they knew the
reward for the fajr and ‘ishā prayer they would have reached
the mosque even if they had to drag themselves for this.5
A person who
prayed the ‘ishā prayer in congregation is like a person who stood for
worship till midnight and a person who prayed the fajr prayer in
congregation is like a person who spent the whole night standing in worship.6
Both these
types of narratives, of course, oppose one another and cannot be true at the
same time unless there is some other explanation to them.
A
deliberation on the Qur’an shows that in the times of the Prophet (sws),
there had come a time after the truth had been conclusively communicated to
his addressees when true believers were separated and isolated from the
Hypocrites and Disbelievers so that the final judgement of God could be
pronounced on the latter two denominations. The first category of narratives
seems to be an application of this directive of God: coming to the mosque
was a barometer in determining who was a true believer and who was not.
Hence this was regarded as compulsory. However, after the departure of the
Prophet (sws), this was of course no longer required since the divine
practice of God regarding His Messengers had reached its culmination.
In other
words, what can be said is that while the first category of narratives
relates to the divine practice of God regarding His Messengers, the second
category gives a general picture.
Needless to
say that all narratives must be related to their basis in the Qur’ān and
Sunnah or in the norms of sense and reason for narratives cannot give an
independent directive of religion. They must be related to their basis in
the original sources.
After Surah Mulk, Surah
Qalam, Surah Haaqqah,Surah Ma'aarij, Surah Nuh, Surah Jinn, Surah Muzzammil,
Surah Muddaththir, Surah Qiyamah, Surah Dahr, Surah Mursalat, Surah Naba, Surah
Nazi'aat, Surah Abas, Surah Takweer, Surah Infitar, Surah Mutaffifin, Surah
Inshiqaq, Surah Buruj, Surah Tariq, Surah A'laa, Surah Ghashiyah, Surah Fajr,
Surah Balad, Surah Shams, Surah Layl, Surah Duha, Surah Alam Nashrah, Surah
Teen, Surah Alaq, Surah Qadr, Surah Bayyinah, Surah Zilzal Surah ‘Adiyat, Surah
Qariah and Surah Takathur, Surah Asr we have uploaded Surah Humazah in the
“Quran for All” series.
The “Quran for All” Series is a software for understanding the meanings of the
Quran for those who do not have any knowledge of Arabic but are able to read the
Quran.
Remember in order to study Surah Humazah one must first study Surah Mulk and
then other surahs in the sequence that they occur in the Quran and are also
provided in the software in this sequence.