|
|
Reflections |
|
In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Ever
Merciful
|
The
Reflection of Sincere Faith
As
we repose faith in the Lord, our immediate desire is to be what our Lord
wants us to be. Awed by His Mercy and Grandeur, we surrender before the
religion He has revealed. With veritable sincerity of heart, we wish that
this religion must govern our life such that no aspect of it should escape
the religious directives. Encapsulated thus within the confines of religion,
this life should exude unmistakable conformity with these directives and
even more so with the spirit underlying them.
This is the only true reflection of our sincere faith since to disregard the
spirit is actually to throw the directive back in the face of the Master.
Any act performed to the exclusion of the spirit is liable to attract Divine
wrath instead of gaining favor. As we prostrate before the Lord, our heart
should also prostrate, and as we give away money in charity, we should also
truly acknowledge the right of the recipients in our hard earned wealth. As
much as there is need to observe the form of the directive, there is need to
comply with its substance. Without substance, any duty performed is a mere
physical exercise that may bring worldly benefit with no share in the reward
of the Hereafter. For the express directives, therefore, the right and true
approach is to follow them in letter and spirit.
As for the spheres of human activity where we have not been given any
express directive, this sincere faith again goads us on to carefully decide
a definite course of action. Once decided, it insists that we should abide
by it. To take our religious decisions lightly, which we sometimes make, has
also been condemned by the Almighty (the Qur’an, 2:187). To
contravene what we feel is God’s wish is no less in severity of error than
disregard the explicit directives of God. Besides, it is the obvious
requirement of our faith in Allah that we endeavor to find the right path in
activities not directly addressed by religion, and stick to it at all cost.
Without reflection, the wrong path chosen may cripple and incapacitate us to
follow even the explicit directives of religion. A little mistake here
may precipitate circumstances of profoundly undesirable consequences. Each
step should be trekked with caution and care.
The
knowledge of the entire religion should come to our aid to make the
befitting decision in such situations. The Islamic scholars, who have
expertise in religious sciences, should be resorted to in this regard though
their help in understanding the explicit directives is equally warranted.
The fact that they spend day and night in understanding the word of God
confers on them the privilege to guide the masses both about the explicit
directives, and the issues not directly touched upon. They keenly observe
the spirit present in the specific directives of the Shari‘ah while
giving their humble verdict. With a vision sharpened by the revelation, they
are better placed to help us choose the right path whenever we stand in
confusion on the crossroads.
Author: Jhangeer
Hanif
URL:
http://www.renaissance.com.pk/Juned2y5.htm
|
|
In this
Issue |
|
Reflections
* The
Religion of
Sincere Faith
|
|
Read & Reflect
*
Some Popular
Misconceptions of
the Muslims
|
|
Debate & Discuss * Discussion Forum:
Understanding
Islamic Political
Directives
return
to the top ^
|
|
Express & Explain
*General Discussion
Forum: Islamic
Law vs. Lawmaking
by Human
return
to the top ^
|
|
Pause & Ponder
* Islam
and Human
Rights
return
to the top ^
|
|
Announcements
*
Regarding
Foul
Postings at the
Forums
*
Successful Participants
|
|
Recent Additions
* Articles * Q n As
return to the top ^
Spot on Site
return to the top ^
|
|
Read and Reflect : |
|
Some Popular Misconceptions of the
Muslims
Individuals
who stay away from practicing Islam despite being Muslims fall into two broad
categories: There is one group whose apparent association with Islam owes itself
entirely to the accident of birth. They retain their Muslim names and
participate in some of the socially significant Islamic events only to maintain
their apparent Muslim identity. They are neither convinced about the
truthfulness of the message of Islam nor are they interested in following it
sincerely. Few people would dispute the claim that their Muslim identity is only
a this-worldly arrangement and that on the Day of Judgment their claim to Islam
would be discarded.
The
second category consists of those people who take pride in acknowledging the
veracity of Islam. They make attempts to follow its teachings as far as
convenience is not threatened to be compromised. However, a closer look at their
lifestyles reveals that, much the same way as the first group, they too are in
fact immersed in their greed for their this-worldly life. Their practical
contact with the shari‘ah is strictly confined to the narrow limits allowed by
the predominance of their worldly objectives. Thus they care to follow only that
part of Islam which is consistent with the contemporary fashion or which at
least does not run contrary to its requirements. Their real happiness is
associated with worldly successes; they are genuinely grieved only over worldly
privations. Despite this completely “one-eyed” approach to life, they are
fully convinced that the exciting prospects of the other life too are, beyond
doubt, going to be for them to enjoy. Whatever be the truth about their motives,
at least some of them defend their approach by presenting arguments, some of
which are apparently based on the Qur’an and the Sunnah. It is important,
therefore, that a dispassionate analysis of those arguments be made to help them
realize that the superstructure of their expectations is based upon extremely
fragile foundations.
The
gist of their arguments is being presented below. People belonging to this
category do not generally present all the listed arguments. In fact, in most
cases, it is only one of the described reasons that is cited to absolve the
individual from taking the obligations of the shari‘ah seriously.
One
popular argument presented is that the most predominant attribute of Allah
Almighty is Mercy. How then is it possible that the Almighty is going to allow
us to be consigned to Hell when we are following at least some part of Islam
along side pursuing our worldly ambitions. Another argument offered is that
since we have the privilege of being the followers of the last and the favourite
Prophet of Allah (sws), and since it is a well known fact that Allah Almighty
will grant to his Prophet (sws) the right to intercede for his followers, how is
it possible that the Prophet’s intercession will not come to our rescue. Even
if the sinning side of our balance would be heavier, intercession of the Prophet
(sws) will make amends for that.
According
to a third argument, many traditions of the Prophet (sws) confirm that all those
people who had recited the kalimah
shall enter Paradise, and that since we were born to Muslim families and got the
privilege of reciting the kalimah many times. Who then can deny us this
birth-right of ours. A little more reasonable amongst this group present a
seemingly more logical argument for the defence of their case. There is no
doubt, they say, that we are sinners and are violating Allah’s law on a fairly
regular basis, however, we do keep seeking His forgiveness during prayers and
even outside prayers. It is quite clear from the contents of the Qur’an and
the Sunnah that repentance cleanses one’s sins. After this knowledge, why
should we make our lives unnecessarily miserable by following all aspects of the
shari‘ah. What’s so wrong, after all, in a compromise between a this-worldly
and a that-worldly attitude?
Finally,
there is another argument presented: The shari‘ah has two types of
injunctions: those which are directly relevant to Allah and those that have to
do with one’s obligations towards fellow humans. While the latter category of
injunctions are more important to be followed, the obligations towards Allah are
not. If we are telling the truth, refraining from getting involved in bribes,
helping the poor, keeping our promises, and strictly adhering to other similar
injunctions, why then shall we not be successful in the Hereafter just for not
saying prayers regularly, or not fasting, or not going for hajj and not
following similar injunctions which are matters of personal relevance between
the individual and his God. When scales are going to be drawn on the Day of
Judgement, how is it possible that our significantly important good deeds will
not be able to outweigh the relatively less important blemishes.
Let
us analyze these arguments to find out whether they do merit the confidence of
those who are using them for justifying their life patterns or not.
Author: Dr.
Khalid Zaheer (Tr. by Shehzad Saleem)
Topic URL:
http://www.monthly-renaissance.com/issue/content.aspx?id=37
|
|
Debate and Discuss: |
|
|
Discussion Forum:
Understanding Islamic Political Directives
Module 1:
Revolt against an Islamic State
Siddiq Bukhary (Moderator)
The verse 4:59
says 'Obey God and the Prophet and those of you who are in authority'
keeping in view
the directive of this verse, can a Muslim citizen revolt against an Islamic
state?
If I am not wrong,
I think Muslims can revolt against an Islamic state is the state is doing
something against the Islamic Shariah.
I think that it
will depend on the situation, and if all Muslim citizens revolt against that
state or just couple of people that have an issue with that government. They
can though if the state is doing something that is against Islamic Law or
Qur'an.
In an Islamic
state, Muslims, as soon as their Amir is elected, have to pledge their loyalty
to him; Muslims can object their rulers behavior (and this is only possible if
the ruler is violating the Islamic law), but it is recommended by the Prophet,
saws, that they be patient for some time, and leave the rebellion as the last
solution.
So how long would
you be willing to wait, and do you think that if you do wait that problem
might get bigger, and harder to solve?
Siddiq Bukhary (Moderator)
No Muslim citizen
has been given the permission to revolt against the government unless he has
the backing of a clear majority behind him. The reason for this is that if the
majority does not support him then such a revolt would not be against the
government; on the contrary it would be against other Muslim citizens which
according to the Shariah is Fisad Fil Arad, an offence punishable by death and
if this revolt takes the shape of an armed uprising then it should be subject
to all the conditions of jehad imposed by the Sharaih.
Clear and telling
examples of such fasad (anarchy) can be witnessed in Algeria and Egypt and it
is rearing its head in Pakistan!
As long as the
leader is following the deen as best as he possibly can then it is forbidden
to revolt against him or his appointed governors and advisors. We see this is
true in the first speeches given by both Abu Bakr, and Umar (RA).
Abu Bakr
- "Praise be to Allah! I am now in authority over you, but I am not the best
among you. If I act virtuously, help me. If I act wrongfully, correct me.
Truth is honesty, falsehood is treachery.
The weak among you is strong in my sight, until I give him what is due to him,
if Allah wills it. And the strong among you is weak in my sight, until I take
what is due from him, if Allah wills it.
Let none among you
abjure the holy war in the way of Allah, for no people do so but Allah strikes
them with disgrace. And among no people does vice become general but Allah
inflicts upon them terrible punishment.
Obey me while I
obey Allah and His Messenger; and if I disobey Allah and His Messenger, you
are not obliged to follow me.
Forget not your
prayers. May Allah have mercy upon you!"
Umar
-"Lo! The Arab is like a camel which follows its master and waits for him
wherever it is made to sit. And by the Lord of the Kabah, I shall carry you on
the right path."
I feel that in our
current situation it is perfectly fine to revolt against the leaders of most
Muslim countries, because they are misguided. Most of them never read the
Quran yet they are incharge of running our affairs. This is not right, because
they will lead their people astray. A good example of this is Pervez Musharraf,
who drinks wine and owns a dog. Not only that, but he sends his troops to
fight Muslims and is also quoted as saying that "Muslims are the most ignorant
people on the face of the planet".
What we need to do
is unite under a single government and appoint a Caliph. This is the type of
government Muslims have had for centuries, until just recently. So we need to
stop this nonsense of nationalism, and focus on uniting under a single flag in
Dar-al-Islam.
I believe that
revolt is something that is recommended unless the leader commits clear cut
kufr. also the prophet prophesized this in the hadith that after the khulafah,
we will have kingship after that we will have tyrants and after that we will
have khulafah. People want Shariah but they don't even know the basic
requirements of a Shariah, rather super impose their own views of how the
state should be. and Allahu alam.
Samarqani could
not be more right!
I agree with you
brother Abdullah. May Allah guide all those who still call for nationalism.
|
|
Express and Explain: |
General Discussion Forum:
Islamic
Law vs. Lawmaking by Humans
There have been repeated debates especially within
Pakistan, throughout its history, regarding whether Man-made law (i.e. The
Constitution) clashes and/or interferes with the jurisdiction of Divine law
(i.e. Shariah). Our religious scholars have often raised a concern, by framing
it as a question of Sovereignty of Allah vs. Sovereignty of people. Their
claim is that if Allah is Sovereign (as the Constitution itself states that He
is), there shouldn’t be a man-made law in the first place, if it is there,
it should only deal with those issues not touched by Shariah. And any law
making done on an issue where a slightest of hint by Quran, Sunnah or even by
a statement of a Faqeeh (Muslim Jurist) has been dropped, is a trespassing on
the jurisdiction of Shariah.
The question then is, what is the jurisdiction of
Shariah?, the one which cannot be crossed, where and how are its boundaries
drawn? What to do when within people/scholars there is difference of opinion
on these boundaries? what precisely should be the ambit of human lawmaking?
perv1
Which Islamic laws are you
referring to?
salmant I am not referring to any
particular law, I am referring to 'The Shariah', including all the laws that
relate to it.
perv1quote:
I am not referring to any particular law, I am referring to 'The
Shariah', including all the laws that relate to it.
Well be bit more precise because
different sects have different ideas about shariah laws.
salmant
You
are right. Infact, that is the source of the problem, when it comes to the
lawmaking in a country. The difference of opinion causes uncertainty regarding
the ambit/jurisdiction of The Shariah and also regarding whether there is
trespassing on it by the lawmakers while they are suggesting new laws or
amending old ones for the Constitution.
My question is not concerned with difference of
opinion on any individual laws. My question is: Given that there is
uncertainty regarding the jurisdiction of The Shariah for lawmakers because of
variant opinions, is it possible for them to make laws, which are
unambiguously in accordance with Quran and Sunnah? If not then is it necessary
for a Constitution of an Islamic Country to place this constraint of Quran
& Sunnah for lawmaking?
I hope I have made my question clearer, but please
ask if it is not due to my bad writing skills.
|
|
Pause
and Ponder: |
|
|
Islam and Human Rights
Question
asked by Aslam Hayat.
Posted on: Monday, January 16, 2006 - Hits: 499
Question:
I have been a student of Islam
all my life. I always wonder if there are the same basic rights and freedom for
a Muslim in Islam as those in the Western society. If it differs then what are
the parameters of the Islamic concept of the basic rights of an individual in a
Muslim Society?
Answer:
In principle we share all
universal values and rights with humanity. These rights and values are ingrained
in human nature and common to all. For this reason, Islam does not provide a
list of all values and human rights. However, it has provided basic guidelines
regarding matters where the Almighty felt to reveal some guidance and where
human intellect could falter. For example regarding political freedom the
Shari’ah has given the golden rule that the collective affairs of the
believers have to be decided with mutual consultation. The Islamic Shari'ah has
also stressed the sanctity of life, honour and property. I do not think any
would differ with it here. Another important thing is the freedom of choice
regarding religious affairs. Islam does not force people to accept the faith.
However, once they have entered the faith they need to observe the religious
directives. In this case they would be willfully following a code
In fact Islam stresses the importance of all the
moral good and forbids all moral vices. Now the western modal of freedom, which
is no doubt a positive thing, sometimes tends to disregard other social, moral,
and religious good which makes it erratic. It is only an imbalance in various
values which seems so contrasting with our conceptions of the same values.
Regards,
Tariq Mahmood Hashmi
Research Assistant, Studying Islam
see: http://www.studying-islam.org/querytext.aspx?id=417
return
to the top ^
|
|
|
|
Announcements: |
|
Regarding Foul Postings at the Forums
Monday,
September 10, 2007
Recently, the forums of
Studying Islam have been unduly and persistently attacked by hackers and this
has caused trouble to our forum participants off and on.
We have been trying to tackle this problem. Because of the highly tolerant
policy of this site, the hackers have been able to take advantage and pollute
the forums with unacceptable language and personal targeting of other members
and forum moderators.
We had to take an action by introducing a Forum Code of Conduct and by the
cancellation of such registrations. However because filtration is never 100%
possible, these posters kept returning with changed identities. This caused a
lot of harassment and bullying to our members who wished to interact in safe and
healthy environment and sadly quite a few decided to stop
participating-including some of our moderators in the past.
We are pleased to announce that we have now been able to cleanse the forums to a
reasonable extent and our members can continue their discussion in a better and
more tolerant atmosphere. Because of the cleansing process you may have noticed
a sudden disappearance of traffic from the Forums. However, since Studying Islam
believes in quality and not quantity, we intend to continue our members'
discussions and exchange of views in a more suitable atmosphere.
We assume that this is going to be an ongoing process of cleansing as and when
the site gets attacked by trouble makers. We therefore request our members and
moderators equally to bear with us whilst we make efforts to keep things
smoother and more favorable.
Directorate of Student Affairs
Studying Islam
http://www.studying-islam.org/announcement.aspx?id=155
Successful Participants
|
ID |
Course
Name |
Country |
Grade |
|
8152 |
Family and Marriage: Related
Issues |
Finland |
E |
|
3806 |
History of the Qur'an |
UK |
B |
|
7786 |
Islamic Customs and Etiquette |
UK |
E |
|
8056 |
Islamic Customs and Etiquette |
USA |
C |
|
8183 |
Islamic Punishments: Basic
Directives |
Ethopia |
B+ |
|
3806 |
Preaching Islam |
UK |
A+ |
|
8151 |
Preaching Islam |
India |
C |
|
159 |
Preaching Islam |
USA |
A |
|
8135 |
Revelation of the Qur'an |
South Africa |
B+ |
|
8226 |
The Religion of Islam |
Portugal |
A |
|
8181 |
The Religion of Islam |
USA |
B+ |
|
8152 |
The Religion of Islam |
Finland |
D+ |
|
159 |
The Religion of Islam |
USA |
B+ |
|
8147 |
The Religion of Islam |
USA |
A+ |
|
835 |
Understanding the Sunnah |
Canada |
C |
|