|
|
Reflections |
|
In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Ever
Merciful |
To
Humble before Knowledge
The traditional approach
to education in Islamic Sciences is the most
appealing to my
mind. The teaching method of personal tutelage seems to fit not
only the psychic
structure of the students but also conforms to the spiritual
make up of the
teachers, who wish to transmit the invaluable treasure of
knowledge. In the
maze of insuperable enigmas, teachers guide their pupils how
to find the way
out. In the unfathomable ocean of delusional questions, they
take their hands
and swim to the surface to help them breathe clarity and
certitude.
The tunnel of ignorance which
the ‘toddlers’ are liable to trip up in is
lit by the enduring
flame fueled by the compassion of the teachers. As long as
the ability to learn is
accompanied by the insatiable desire for knowledge, the
compassion remains in a
perpetual state of burning. Despite the fact that many a
time the teachers
provide for the sustenance of their students, they do not feel
crossed when their
premises are dauntlessly questioned and their conclusions are
audaciously challenged
by their students. The more questions are debated, the
more intensely the
flame burns – and sheds light on the hitherto hidden aspect
of the problem. Having
a first hand knowledge of the personal inhibitions of
students puts the
teachers in a very favorable position vis-à-vis communication
of knowledge is
concerned. More often than not, an impregnable bridge soon comes
into being to let the
traffic of ideas moves about speedily in highly
sophisticated parlance
– which only aim at utmost precision and exactitude. The
theme which was
obscured in the mist of confusion, of surety, comes into the
veritable sunlight.
The
expedition of learning which begins by studying the scholarly masterpieces of
the earliest great Muslims ends with the investigation of the works of the
contemporary scholars. Each and every important sentence is debated, and the
themes presented are voraciously devoured in sheer hunger of knowledge.
Objective analysis and free inquiry into the sources signify the hallmark of
this expedition. While this is done, time is taken to understand and appreciate
the works, and due regards are paid to the authors. Whatever discipline is
studied, the teacher stands at the focal point of this activity. To sit before
him is to humble before knowledge – that always eludes the bigheaded and makes
friends with the humble
_________________
Author:
Jhangeer Hanif
|
|
In this
Issue |
|
Reflections
* To Humble before
Knowledge
|
|
Read & Reflect
*
The Basic Premise
of the Religion
|
|
Debate & Discuss * Discussion Forum: Norms of
Gender
Interaction
return
to the top ^
|
|
Express & Explain
*
General Discussion
Forum:
how to
act/react to Salman
Rushdie's matter....
return
to the top ^
|
|
Pause & Ponder
*
Marriage with Step
Daughters
return
to the top ^
|
|
Announcements
*
Successful Participants
Recent
Additions
* Articles * Q n As
return
to the top ^
|
|
Spot on Site
return
to the top ^
|
|
Read and Reflect : |
|
The Basic Premise of Religion
Author:
Javed Ahmad Ghamidi
Tr. by Shehzad Saleem
The basic premise of religion is that this
world has a creator; He has created this world as a trial; thus He has sent
man in this world for a specific period of time; at the conclusion of this
period, this world will necessarily end and its earth and heavens shall be
replaced by a new earth and new
heavens; a new world will then come into
being. All mankind shall be raised up there and shall be rewarded or
punished on the basis of their beliefs and deeds.
Religion requires us to accept this
reality. Obviously, it is essential that such a reality be very well known
to man. Consequently, from the very first day of creation the Almighty has
made arrangements that no one should be able to deny this reality on the
basis of knowledge and intellect, and this reality should remain so evident
before people that those who deny it would not be able to present any excuse
before the Almighty on the Day of Judgement.
Intuitive Evidence
How was this reality communicated to
people such that they were not left with any excuse to deny it? The Qur’an
informs us that an acknowledgement of the providence of the Almighty is
found innately in man’s nature. It says that this matter manifested itself
in the form of a pledge. The Qur’an refers to this event as a real-life
incident and not something metaphorical. Since man has been sent here for
trial, the whole incident has been erased from his memory; however, its
essence is etched on his heart and ingrained in his soul and nothing can
obliterate it. Consequently, if man is reminded of it in the absence of any
hindrance in his surroundings, he leaps to it the way a child leaps to its
mother even though it never saw itself emerge from her womb and is drawn
towards her with such conviction as if it already knew her. A person feels
that this pledge of his with the Almighty was the answer to a very natural
need found within him. The Qur’an says that this testimony of man’s
inner-self is so undeniable that as far as the providence of God is
considered, man will be held accountable before God merely on the basis of
this testimony:
وَإِذْ أَخَذَ رَبُّكَ مِن بَنِي آدَمَ مِن ظُهُورِهِمْ ذُرِّيَّتَهُمْ
وَأَشْهَدَهُمْ عَلَى أَنفُسِهِمْ أَلَسْتَ بِرَبِّكُمْ قَالُواْ بَلَى
شَهِدْنَا أَن تَقُولُواْ يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ إِنَّا كُنَّا عَنْ هَذَا
غَافِلِينَ
أَوْ
تَقُولُواْ إِنَّمَا أَشْرَكَ آبَاؤُنَا مِن قَبْلُ وَكُنَّا ذُرِّيَّةً مِّن
بَعْدِهِمْ أَفَتُهْلِكُنَا بِمَا فَعَلَ الْمُبْطِلُونَ
وَكَذَلِكَ نُفَصِّلُ الآيَاتِ وَلَعَلَّهُمْ يَرْجِعُونَ
(٧: ١٧٢-١٧٤)
And remember when your Lord brought forth
from the loins of the progeny of Adam their children
and made them testify against themselves. He said: “Am I not your Lord?”
They replied: “We bear witness that You are.” This We did lest you should
say on the Day of Judgement: “We had no knowledge of that,” or present the
excuse: “Our forefathers had already adopted idolatry and we later became
their children so will You destroy us on account of what these false-doers
did?” [We have fully explained things here] and thus do We explain Our
revelations [so that people are left with no excuse to deny the truth] and
so that they may return to the right path. (7:172-174)
Same is the case with good and evil. A
person has innate knowledge of good and evil. The Qur’an says:
وَنَفْسٍ وَمَا سَوَّاهَا فَأَلْهَمَهَا فُجُورَهَا
وَتَقْوَاهَا قَدْ أَفْلَحَ مَنْ زَكَّاهَا وَقَدْ خَابَ مَنْ دَسَّاهَا
(٩١:
٧-١٠)
(And the soul bears witness and the
perfection given to it. Then [God] inspired it with its evil and its good,
91: 7-10). In some other verses of the Qur’an, this aspect is referred to by
the words:
إِنَّا
هَدَيْنَاهُ السَّبِيلَ
(٧٦:٣)
(We inspired in him
the way of good and evil, (76:3)) and
(١٠:٩٠)
وَهَدَيْنَاهُ
النَّجْدَيْنِ
(Have We not shown him both the paths?
(90:10)). In the above quoted verses, the Qur’an has made it clear that just
as the Almighty has blessed a person with eyes to see and ears to hear,
similarly, he has blessed him with a moral faculty which distinguishes good
and evil for him. This aspect of our soul as per which it can be called the
reproaching soul which admonishes us like a preacher on an evil committed
springs from this faculty. Thus we see that distinguishing good from evil
and the awareness that good is good and evil is evil are universal realities
which no one can deny. The Qur’an says that after this testimony of a
person’s inner-self, no one can deny reward and punishment. It says:
لَا
أُقْسِمُ بِيَوْمِ الْقِيَامَةِ
وَلَا أُقْسِمُ بِالنَّفْسِ اللَّوَّامَةِ
أَيَحْسَبُ الْإِنسَانُ أَلَّنْ نَجْمَعَ عِظَامَهُ
بَلَى قَادِرِينَ عَلَى أَنْ نُسَوِّيَ بَنَانَهُ
بَلْ يُرِيدُ الْإِنسَانُ لِيَفْجُرَ أَمَامَهُ
يَسْأَلُ أَيَّانَ يَوْمُ الْقِيَامَة
فَإِذَا بَرِقَ الْبَصَرُ
وَخَسَفَ الْقَمَرُ
وَجُمِعَ الشَّمْسُ وَالْقَمَرُ
يَقُولُ الْإِنسَانُ يَوْمَئِذٍ أَيْنَ الْمَفَرُّ
كَلَّا لَا وَزَرَ
إِلَى رَبِّكَ يَوْمَئِذٍ الْمُسْتَقَرُّ
يُنَبَّأُ الْإِنسَانُ يَوْمَئِذٍ بِمَا قَدَّمَ وَأَخَّرَ
بَلِ الْإِنْسَانُ عَلَى نَفْسِهِ بَصِيرَةٌ
وَلَوْ أَلْقَى
مَعَاذِيرَهُ
(٥٧
:
١
-٥
١)
[They think that the Day of Judgement will
never be]; By no means! I present as evidence the Day of Judgement itself.
And [they think that the Day of Judgement is a far-fetched reality]. By no
means! I present as evidence this reproaching soul [within you]. Does man
think that We will not be able to bring together his bones? Why not? We can
put together his very finger tips. [No this is not so]; in fact [the truth
is that] man wants to be mischievous before his [conscience]. He asks: “When
will the Day of Judgement be?” But on the day when the sight is dazed and
the moon eclipsed and the sun and the moon brought together, this very man
will say: “Whither to flee?” – No! there is no refuge now! Towards your Lord
that Day is the resting place. On that Day will man be informed what he sent
forth and what he left behind. [No, he cannot deny it]; in fact, he himself
is a witness upon his own self however much he may put up excuses. (75:
1-15)
Imam Amin Ahsan Islahi, while explaining
this argument of the Qur’an, writes:
Now the question is that if a person has a
guardian within his conscience which chides him on every evil that emanates
from him, then how can it be imagined that man will be not be held
accountable for his deeds. Why would he go scot-free if he spends a life in
whatever manner he wants to while negating the calls of his conscience? If a
person will not be held accountable for his deeds, then where has this
chiding conscience come into him from? If his Creator is unconcerned about
the good and evil which emanates from him, then why and from where has He
given him the feeling of being elated at a good deed and being pricked by
his conscience at a bad one? Then from here another question arises: If God
has set up a miniature court of justice in every person, then why will He
not set up a greater court of justice which will hold the whole world
accountable for good and evil which emanate from it and not reward and
punish people accordingly? Any person who deliberates on these questions
while disregarding his desires will reach the conclusion that the very being
of a person bears witness that he has innate knowledge of good and evil; he
will not be left unaccountable; there definitely shall come one day when he
will be punished for any misdeeds he may have done and be rewarded for his
good deeds. To remind a person of this very Day, the Almighty has placed a
miniature court of justice within a person’s soul so that man does not
remain indifferent to it, and if ever he becomes indifferent he can catch a
glimpse of it by merely reflecting on his inner-self. It is this very
reality which sages have taught us by saying that man is a miniature world
and within this miniature world there is a reflection of the greater world.
If a person has a true comprehension of his own self, he is able to
comprehend both God and the Hereafter.
Topic URL: July
2007 http://www.monthly-renaissance.com/
|
|
Debate and Discuss: |
|
|
Discussion Forum:
Norms of Gender Interaction
Topic: Module 2 Using Perfumes
Jhangeer Hanif (Moderator)
What is the
implication that the Holy Prophet forbade Muslim women to wear strong
perfumes, when going outside.
Always pray that all of u brothers & sisters in
ISlam are good by the grace of Allah (SWT).
From the answers I've collected from people, the
following is what I got:
I'm sorry I don't really have a Hadith to support
what I am saying and also I don't even think I deserve to answer this question
since I'm a perfume user myself however, may we all change for the good as
time passes by, Ameen.
Perfume whether strong or mild is Haraam in Islam
because the majority of them contain Alcohol and using alcohol to nourish our
body is forbidden. Also, I've also read that you wouldn't drink Alcohol right
because it could kill you therefore why would you wear it on your body?
However, this is not such a strong way to prove my point since there are some
non-toxication alcohols as well. But from something I remember, it's not a
hadith but in general it is said that things that may attract non-mehrams like
make-up, tacky jewerlies should not be worn in public and perfume definetly
falls in this category. I really hope my knowledge has made some difference
and sense. I'm sure other sisters & brothers here know better. In my opinion,
just don't use the things which you have doubts about...
Fi'amanillah
Jhangeer Hanif (Moderator)
Indeed, we improve
day by day, insha Allah, if we set our eyes on the nobler ideals.
We need also to continue to gain knowledge as
much as it relates to our daily affairs. I appreciate that you have replied to
the post above. I would like you to please elaborate how drinking something
and sprinkling it on dress can be equated.
The part where you
have said that we must "gain knowledge as much as it realties to our daily
affairs" has touched my heart and it is very true, something I really believe
in as we all should too. Inshallah as soon as I collect more information on
how drinking and sprinkling something like alcohol can be compared then I will
provide you with the details ASAP.
Just a thought
regarding the wearing of perfumes, fragrances, and the like.
It seems to me that if one follows modesty, and
hence the glorification of Allah (SWT) then these applications would indeed be
Haraam, since the result of their applications-on men or women-is generally to
glorify either the wearer or the substance, and not Allah (SWT). And those
applications which are alcohol based would seem to be Haraam, since alcohol is
forbidden.
On the other hand, it seems to me that the
application of soaps, even those resulting in mild fragrance, would be alright
if the idea is to achieve cleanliness and to remove objectionable odors and
not to advertise or glorify oneself or the application. So it is much in the
intention of how the fragrance is used.
Jhangeer Hanif (Moderator)
Thank you for your feedback. I however do not understand how you say that
perfumes are haraam. When we use perfumes we do not glorify ourselves against
the Almighty like wearing a dress is not to glorify yourself contrary to God.
It needs to be remembered that Allah has warned
us not to say that Zeenat is haraam that Allah has created for his men. (7:32)
I understand that alcohol is forbidden for us to drink. However, nowhere it
has been made unlawful to be used in perfumes because they do not intoxicate
you.
And what do you think of perfumes that are bereft
of alcohol?
I stand corrected
regarding my comments that alcohol used for cosmetics is haraam-it's apparent
to me that the Quran's references are to alcohol forbidden in consumption, as
taken into the body. But I do believe that cosmetics should be used modestly,
to create a nice fragrance, but not to advertise oneself.
I try to use only soaps that are bereft of
alcohol-my personal preference is to use only natural (no artificial
chemicals) soaps (I like and use African black soaps). I am concerned that
many artificial chemicals used as cosmetics lead to damage-especially
accelerated drying-to the skin.
But again, the Quran's forbidden use of alcohol
clearly references only consumption.
aslamu alaikum! I
have a confusion about this perfume matter. Here in Pakistan in extreme hot
weather and humidity, using perfume is an absolute necessity, I try not to
wear the strong perfumes but deodorants and mild perfumes are necessary in
order to mask the severe smell of sweating, is this haraam?
return
to the top ^
|
|
Express and Explain: |
General Discussion Forum:
how to act/react to salman rushdie's
matter....
The matter of salman rushdie's knighthood is indeed another test for us and out
faith, for our love for the beloved prophet Muhammad sws whom we are supposed to
love more than our blood relations; yet it is a test of our patience at the same
time. we ought to hold tight to wisdom; we have to act no doubt but in the most
appropriate way utilize this opportunity to clarify the situation.
Myself as the VP of
pak welfare association in a local community in UK, today we have passed a
resolution in the association meeting against this decision and we have
organized a meeting with the local MP in this regard for further details and to
convey our concerns to the parliament.
Everyone can act
with the skills and opportunities he/she has.
We also look upto
our genius religious scholars to write about this matter for the general public
as well as the state authorities.
am also copying
below a message from Muslim council of Britain.
The Muslim Council
of Britain is disturbed at the deliberate political decision to confer a
knighthood to Salman Rushdie, who vilified our beloved Prophet Muhammad (Peace
Be Upon Him) and caused deep hurt to Muslims everywhere.
Today the Muslim
Council has written to its affiliate mosques and organisations urging that they
face this current provocation with dignity and wisdom and channel their hurt
towards positive and peaceful actions. They must resist efforts by fringe
elements in the community to exploit disappointment felt at the award.
The MCB has asked
its affiliates and the community to convey their feelings on the matter through
letters to their parliamentary representatives and through local and national
media; at all times observing propriety and restraint.
“This ill advised
decision approved by the Prime Minister should not divert you from your course
of peaceful protest in the face of this deliberate provocation. Indeed, it
should be used as an opportunity to correct the maligning of the character of
the Prophet (pbuh) in the book which earned its author his notoriety”, said Dr
Muhammad Abdul Bari, MCB Secretary-General.
Yes, sister Henna it is a big test again. I sincerely hope we respond to this
the way our beloved prophet pbuh and his family responded in such circumstances.
Being an associate
of MCB we have written a letter to our local MP. I urge every member of the
forum to register his/her disapproval on knighting Salman Rushdie in the most
dignified manner at their local MPs.
I attach our letter
to Mr James Purnell MP Stalybridge, Cheshire;
Respected Member of
Parliament
On behalf of my
organisation, Understanding Islam United Kingdom (UI UK), I would like to
register our protest at the decision of our government to award knighthood to Mr
Salman Rushdie.
Our organisation
strongly encourages mutual respect for diverse faiths and schools of thoughts.
We are actively engaged in building bridges between different religions, people
of different faiths and communities. For this purpose we are engaged in the
inter faith forum in Manchester.
Muslims have the
ultimate love and respect for our Prophet Of God (peace be upon him). Mr Salman
Rushdie is responsible for not only ridiculing our beloved prophet (peace be
upon him) but he has also contributed in damaging race and faith relations in
United Kingdom, these were never in question prior to the writing of his now
infamous book 'The Satanic Verses."
We have the utmost
respect for the law and order of our country. We do not support any activity
that entails violence. We also believe in the justice of our country. Knighthood
is awarded for achievement and excellence in a particular field. It is awarded
for heroic efforts by an individual which makes the entire nation proud of such
an individual. Most humbly, which criteria does Mr Salman Rushdie fulfil?
We solely believe
in peaceful voicing of our views. However, most humbly, I would like to
highlight the heartbreak and sadness this decision has brought to the Muslims
not only living in UK but all over the world. We feel on this occasion our
government has not decided fairly.
kind regards
Mujahid Zaheer (Co
ordinator)
Dear Mujahid/Dr. Henna,
Thank you for
voicing the views on this sad incident. I call it sad because, unfortunately it
seems muslims have lost their spine against the politically and economically
powerful West. We keep quiet when our values and beliefs are insulted, because
most of us have weak institutions, greedy leaders, extravagant lifestyles. It
was very sad to see UK govt 'surprised' at the agitation from Pakistan, when
other Muslim countries remained quiet.
Our continued
willingness to wipe the boots or our perceived masters, even if that requires
the use of our tongue, is probably a unique feature in the history of nations.
Salman
thx for the link S;
i understand
Khursheed Nadeem is associated with Al-Mawrid institute of Islamic sciences in
some capacity; good to see some contribution.
We sincerely wish
that our dear brs and sisters in Pakistan and elsewhere do not burn flags and
figures--because this will be exactly in line with what some anti Islamic
agencies want them to do; they should rather show constructive attitude as
suggested above.
|
|
Pause
and Ponder: |
|
|
The status of a
Justification of Jihad against Innocent Civilians
Question:
The philosophy of the
'extremist' Muslims seems to be to oppress others regardless of whether they
oppressed you or not, just because they belong to the nation of the oppressor.
Something seems to be wrong with the theory that all Americans pay taxes so they
are funding the violence in Palestine and Afghanistan, so the American civilian
is responsible. But I cannot pinpoint what is wrong with this theory. Maybe you
can shed some light with some hadith or Qur'anic verse. Abu Bakr (rta) as
khalifa did order his men not to kill civilians when they go to war. Civilians
are after all tax payers, and indirectly responsible for what their government
is doing. So why is it wrong to wage war against them?
Answer:
Most Islamic jurists generally agree that the
underlying cause for slaying an enemy is their direct engagement in combat
against Muslims. Certain contemporary individuals have suggested that tax-paying
citizens are 'indirectly' waging war against Muslims. However, there is no
provision within the history of Islamic jurisprudence or Shari'ah for 'indirect'
engagement in combat. For instance, most jurists are in agreement that old
people and disabled individuals cannot be slain. However, these individuals
still contributed taxes to their governing authority even centuries ago. In
fact, because modern times have led to the clear distinction between commoner
and soldier, something not present in the past, it is far easier to distinguish
which individuals are directly engaged in combat.
Furthermore, if we examine this issue under the
guise of common sense, we find that individuals advocating the position under
discussion are in fact undermining their own argument. These individuals often
claim that Muslims can attack their enemies' innocent civilians because our
innocent civilians are being attacked. They rationalize this by suggesting that
because innocent civilians pay taxes they are legitimate targets. However, if
one agrees with this argument, then how can we complain that Muslim innocent
civilians are being killed? After all, don't our innocent civilians also pay
taxes like those of our 'enemies'? Are we to presume that any individual that
paid Zakah to the Islamic state in Madinah was considered a legitimate target
for Islam's enemies?
Finally, it should be understood that taxes are
usually a requirement of living under any governing structure. Every person
under that structure's authority must pay taxes. Since there are few places left
in the world without governing structures, if all tax-payers are legitimate
targets, are we left to believe that there are no innocent civilians left in the
world? In my opinion, this is an illogical suggestion. Individuals pay taxes for
their welfare, which includes many things besides the right to be protected by
their state. To engage in the slaying of innocent civilians is to make a mockery
of Islam's most fundamental teachings regarding the sanctity of life.
regards
Adnan Zulfiqar
Research Assistant, Studying Islam
see: http://www.studying-islam.org/querytext.aspx?id=639
return
to the top ^
|
|
|
|
Announcements: |
|
Successful Participants
|
ID |
Course
Name |
Country |
Grade |
|
7629 |
Arrangement of the Qur'an |
USA |
D |
|
7466 |
Arrangement of the Qur'an |
Pakistan |
D |
|
7640 |
Arrangement of the Qur'an |
USA |
C+ |
|
7534 |
Introduction to the Hadith |
USA |
A |
|
7627 |
Islamic Customs and
Etiquette |
Canada |
E |
|
7031 |
Islamic Customs and
Etiquette |
USA |
E+ |
|
7507 |
Islamic Customs and
Etiquette |
USA |
D+ |
|
6673 |
Islamic Customs and
Etiquette |
USA |
D+ |
|
7433 |
Islamic Customs and
Etiquette |
India |
B+ |
|
7635 |
Islamic Customs and
Etiquette |
USA |
B |
|
7627 |
Norms of Gender Interaction |
Canada |
B+ |
|
7635 |
Norms of Gender Interaction |
USA |
C |
|
7623 |
The Religion of Islam |
USA |
A+ |
|
7627 |
The Religion of Islam |
Canada |
B+ |
|
6818 |
The Religion of Islam |
USA |
B+ |
|
6856 |
The Religion of Islam |
Canada |
A+ |
|
7517 |
Theme of the Qur'an |
USA |
A |
|
7623 |
Understanding Islamic
Dietary Law |
USA |
A+ |
|
5844 |
Understanding the Sunnah |
USA |
C+ |
|
7605 |
Sunnat i Nabawi |
Pakistan |
B+ |
return
to the top ^
|