I appreciate your concerns.
Obviously this article is only a literary piece of writing and is not purported to summarize the Isalmic doctrines. I do not see anything, on the whole, severally wrong with it.
Just as you have discerned that it is not a real dream, but a manner of expression, every reader can find it as such. It is not a lie. It is in the imagination of the author what he describes in the dream.
In summary, I mean to say while something in the article can be pointed out as not a very appropriate description, it is not befitting to write off the article completely as unworthy.