| Author | Topic |
farhanmalik
PAKISTAN
|
 Topic initiated on Monday, November 16, 2009 - 10:00 PM 
Tafseer bil Raay and Contemporary Scholars diff
Can you kindly elaborate the difference between Tafseer bil Raay school and Contemporary Scholars. Aren't they the same? If not can you please give me the differences? |
|
ibrahim
Moderator
PAKISTAN
|
Posted - Friday, November 20, 2009 - 11:55 AM 
Tafseer bil Raay school generaly like to explain Quran without any principle & just from there RAAY or understanding whereas Contemporary Scholars has polish the rules of Tafseer 1st & then they are explaining Quran in the light of those rules.
That'a what I understand. |
|
farhanmalik
PAKISTAN
|
Posted - Sunday, December 20, 2009 - 9:26 PM
If the pupil of Tafseer bit Raay school tried to interpret the Quran without any principles, does that entail that their interpretations are erroneous and hence cannot be relied upon.
Since the contemporary method does incorporate principles does it mean the contemporary method is definitely better than the schools of raay and riwayah.. |
|
ibrahim
Moderator
PAKISTAN
|
Posted - Monday, December 28, 2009 - 4:29 PM
well, there are some general rules of interpretaining any book & they are based on common sense. & there are some specific rules regarding some specific books. So therefore there must be some extra rules for interpertaining the Quran. The more the rules will be followed the more that interpertation will have chances to be more correct.
for some people the contemporary method is definitely be better than the schools of raay and riwayah. but it can be vice versa so decision may vary person to person & the key factor be then the reasoning behind an opinion. |
|