Powered by
UI
Techs
Home
>
Forums
>
>
General Discussion
>
The Qur'an and the Sunnah
Post Reply
Username
Password
Format
Andale Mono
Arial
Arial Black
Book Antiqua
Century Gothic
Comic Sans MS
Courier New
Georgia
Impact
Tahoma
Times New Roman
Trebuchet MS
Script MT Bold
Stencil
Verdana
Lucida Console
1
2
3
4
5
6
Message Icon
Message
- Forum Code is ON
- HTML is OFF
Smilies
[quote]Salam, QUOTE: - It should be ‘if someone proves…, not says’. There is huge difference between the meaning of the words ‘says’ & ‘proves’. I called it after your gossip because you have said only not proved in DOCUMENTATION. QUOTE: - You are going to disprove the ‘Mathematical Miracle of the Qur’an’!!! Yes of course, I am going to disprove it because YOU HAVE FAILED to prove it by providing its DOCUMENTED PROOF rather you are beating about the bushes by using the tricks of FLIGHT OF IDEAS. QUOTE: - YOU EVEN DON’T KNOW HOW TO DRIVE A TWO WHEELER YET YOU ARE GOING TO DRIVE A LUXURY BUSS”!!! I want to know the details of the luxury bus, which the people like you are pushing that from the behind NOT driving. I am astonished to see such a LUXURY bus. I think the followers (of the bus) are now ready to lift it on their heads. QUOTE: - You disturbed by the number 19 (THIS IS ONE OF THE GREAT MIRACLES), because according to the above verses you are DISBELIEVER (I don’t say but the verses above). After doing the WRONG INTERPRETATIONS, “Why do you take the support of Quranic verses to label others disbelievers?” Are you 100 percent sure that you are not a disbelievers? Or do you know exactly what God says? Do not forget, there are several verses, which label you not only disbelievers but MUCH MORE……. QUOTE: - [74:32 -37] Absolutely, (I swear) by the moon. And the night as it passes. And the morning as it shines. THIS IS ONE OF THE GREAT MIRACLES. A warning to the human race. For those among you who wish to advance, or regress Therefore I have asked you to prove (see below) it not to make the CONJECTURE. Your interpretation is like, for example, that of a person named Jacob who considers every Jacob in Quran his own name. What is this phenomenon called? QUOTE: - Then what should be the CRITERION? The criterion is about Code 19 only i.e. its DOCUMENTED PROOF from the book of Modern Mathematics with Title of the book/Journal, Volume/Edition, Name of the Author, Title of the chapter, Page Number, Year Number and from where punished etc. I try to make you understand by giving the following examples. I. The Arabic or Urdu word, Kitab means book. Suppose someone asks you, how you say that Kitab means book. What will you do? Obviously you will have to give the reference of some AUTHENTICATED dictionary with name of the author, page, No etc. This will be the documented proof of meaning of Kitab. Do not forget, author of the dictionary is NOT ALL IN ALL. He must also keep himself protected against all the enquiry i.e. he must have preserved all the sources from where he prepared the dictionary. II. Giving another example I would like to say, “Can a QUALIFIED DOCTOR prescribe any medicine which has no support of any medical literature?” Mind it, uptill now the status of the CODE you presented is same as that medicine which has NO SUPPORT of any medical literature and even a qualified doctor has NO POWER at all to prescribe it. But if the medical literature supports that medicine then it (the literature) must have preserved all its sources of botany or whatever it is, Physiology of various systems of the body where it acts (beneficially or adversely) and principles and formulae of Mathematics regarding calculations of its doses etc otherwise it is UNACCEPTABLE. By the above examples, I think that my point of view must be clear now if you know the rules and regulation of any research work in general otherwise don’t please beat about the bushes or don’t talk in the illiterate way. Frankly speaking, if you have presented this code, which is the BASE of all the jugglery exhibited, YOU HAVE FAILED TO PROVE IT WITH THE DOCUMENTED PROOF. QUOTE: - But the trickster always try to invent this rule. By the way, have you initiated to copy my question or I did that and who is the trickster and invented this rule to escape answering the question, answer of which you have NOT absolutely? Answer honestly i.e. who initiated to copy……... Do you know your all the posts base on the TRICKS ONLY NOTHING ELSE? According to you “atee-u-allah and atee-ur-rasool” both have the same meanings i.e. obey only God. So why did God say “atee-ur-rasool” (Obey the messenger) as well. Wouldn’t it be sufficient if it were only “atee-u-allah? So why did God say subsequently “atee-ur-rasool” with AND between the two. Is there any importance of AND in any language? Have the people (the tricksters) like you not invented this FALSE rule to take only one meaning of two savings (atee-u-allah wa atee-ur-rasool) of God. QUOTE: - My Criterion is Only Qur’an, and Qur’an says that ‘This is (number19) one of the great miracles’. Your criterion is only DELIBERATE WRONG INTERPRETATION of Holy Quran NOTHING ELSE. Are you ready to present yourself to the experts of the Language? How do you say, “This is (number19) one of the great miracles” while there is NO DOCUMENTED PROOF.[/quote]
Mode
Prompt
Help
Basic
Check here to be notified by email whenever someone replies to your topic
Show Preview
Share
|
Copyright
Studying-Islam
© 2003-7 |
Privacy Policy
|
Code of Conduct
|
An Affiliate of
Al-Mawrid Institute of Islamic Sciences ®
Top